POLICE STATE ALERT--The City of Ottawa wants to search your house!

The lawyers and partners at Quinn Thiele Mineault Grodzki LLP, personal injury lawyers Ottawa, live and work throughout Ottawa. For this reason we are all equally affected by the decisions of our municipal government and the laws that they propose to pass. With this in mind, it should not go unnoticed that the City of Ottawa is considering passing a law that would allow the City to enter your home, without a Court authorized warrant, to simply look around (sure, sure, the scope of the power will be limited--they will say). The City wants a by-law that would give City employees a "power of entry". Now, this power that they are looking for is being proposed in the context of a real problem that needs to be fixed---that is cross connected sewer-lines that instead of dumping household sanitary waste into the City sewer system, dumps it into the storm drain. Sewage that goes into the storm drain remains untreated and pollutes the environment. The City wants to give homeowners money to fix these problems, even though many of these problems were caused by do-it-yourself homeowners and lazy plumbers. Surely it makes sense to reward property owners with a monetary grant for their own incompetence or for hiring incompetent or lazy contractors. Apparently, the City wants the "power of entry" to deal with these problems. One particular City councillor is proposing this and we refer you to an article in the Ottawa Citizen, August 29, 2012, page C5, for details. Do you have a problem with the City being able to enter your home (not just onto your property outside), when they decide they want to take a look around? We certainly do and we object to any City of Ottawa employee having that power. The City says that getting a warrant or court authorized order is simply too expensive and time consuming. Maybe so, and thankfully it is difficult, expensive, and time consuming. It should never be easy for the City of Ottawa to enter our homes and root around in our cupboards. That being said, and as noted earlier, the issue giving rise to the City's desire to enter your home is cross connected sewers in about 50 (yes- fifty) houses. Perhaps, if the City considers it carefully, they will see that it isn't actually all that expensive or time consuming to get judicial sanction to enter a person's home given that it is their castle (you know, that quaint idea that as the owner you rule the roost, emperor of your own domain etc.). Here's our proposal to solve the problem while leaving you with as much privacy and control of your property to decide who sets foot in it as possible. Maybe, just maybe, most homeowners and citizens will recognize that cross connected sewers are indeed something that needs to be fixed. We suspect that most homeowners, if requested, would allow a sewage inspector (newly coined phrase) to enter their home, by appointment, on consent to look for a problem related to the sewer connections. No need for a big stick in those circumstances and no need to tell a homeowner "we're coming in whether you like it or not". For those home owners who say--"get lost City of Ottawa sewage inspector you're not coming in"---the City should provide that homeowner with a letter saying this is why we want into your home and here is our concern. If the refusal is maintained by the homeowner, the City should inform the homeowner that in the absence of their consent to inspect, that the City will apply to Court for Judicial authorization to enter the home. The homeowner should be served with the court application documents and (here's a crazy thought) be afforded the opportunity to dispute the City's desire to enter their house. The Judge hearing the City's application will ultimately decide if the City should have the right to enter a home (likely with a police escort) to do the work they seek to do. If the City wins, the City can ask the Court to order the homeowner to pay the costs of the legal proceeding that led to the order. A Judge can decide whether the homeowner was unreasonable in his refusal to cooperate with the City or not. If the refusal was unreasonable then the homeowner should be ordered to pay all of the costs associated with getting the Judicial authorization to enter the home. There is a counterbalance as well, if the Judge decides the City was wrongly demanding access to the home, the homeowner can be awarded her costs of resisting this intrusion of privacy. We think that proceeding in this way protects the interests of homeowners while at the same time giving the City the tools to fix the sewer problem without it costing the City any money. Under our proposal, the City only ends up out of pocket if it acts unreasonably or makes unreasonable demands of homeowners. Remember, what we are talking about here is not terrorism, not criminal activity, not organized crime. This is about the City of Ottawa entering the homes of law abiding homeowners, tenants, and ordinary citizens to inspect sewer lines. The sewer cross connections are not going anywhere, the evidence isn't going to be hidden, and the number of such homes is only 50 (yes fifty). Surely, this situation does not call for granting the City of Ottawa sewage inspector the sweeping power to enter under your roof without your okay, agreement or consent. This blog is an opinion piece and commentary of Michael K. E. Thiele and does not necessarily reflect the views of all of the lawyers at QTMG LLP.